The Greenland Gambit: What Markets Tell Us About Trump's Arctic Ambitions

When Donald Trump first floated buying Greenland during his first term, it was largely dismissed as a bizarre digression. Now, with the administration actively pursuing the idea, forecasters are taking it seriously—and giving it surprisingly decent odds.

The Numbers

Across prediction markets, Trump's Greenland ambitions trade at roughly 25-27% probability. On Manifold Markets, over 1,000 bettors have weighed in, settling on a 27% chance that the United States acquires at least part of Greenland during Trump's term.

This isn't a majority view, but it's far from negligible. One in four is the probability of rolling a specific number on a four-sided die. It's the kind of odds that demand attention.

Why This Matters

Greenland's strategic value has grown enormously. Climate change is opening Arctic shipping routes. The island sits atop significant rare earth deposits critical to technology manufacturing. Its position makes it invaluable for early-warning radar systems and military logistics.

Denmark, which maintains sovereignty over Greenland despite the territory's substantial autonomy, has repeatedly stated it's not for sale. Greenlandic leaders have been more nuanced, with some expressing interest in closer ties with Washington, if not outright annexation.

The Mechanisms

Markets are pricing in several possible pathways:

Direct purchase remains unlikely but not impossible. Denmark would need to agree, and the Greenlandic population would almost certainly demand a referendum. Current polling suggests Greenlanders are skeptical.

Enhanced autonomy deals could see the US provide significant economic support to Greenland in exchange for military basing rights and preferential resource access—a de facto acquisition without formal sovereignty transfer.

Independence followed by association represents another pathway. Greenland has growing independence movements. A newly independent Greenland might choose close association with the United States over continued ties to Denmark.

The Administration's Leverage

The Trump administration has options. Greenland receives substantial subsidies from Denmark—money that could be matched or exceeded by Washington. American investment in rare earth mining could transform Greenland's economy. And implicit in all negotiations is America's dominant position in NATO and global security arrangements.

What Markets Are Missing

The 25-27% probability might underestimate the complexity. Even if the administration secures some form of agreement, implementation could take years. Environmental reviews, indigenous rights considerations, and construction timelines all extend beyond a single presidential term.

Markets might also overestimate Trump's commitment. Greenland could be a bargaining chip for other negotiations with European allies rather than a genuine territorial priority.

The Arctic Competition

Russia and China both have Arctic ambitions. Russia has extensively militarized its northern territories. China, despite having no Arctic coastline, has declared itself a "near-Arctic state" and invested heavily in polar research and shipping infrastructure.

American acquisition of Greenland would fundamentally reshape Arctic geopolitics—which is precisely why some in the administration view it as essential.

Conclusion

At 25-27%, forecasters see Trump's Greenland push as a real but minority possibility. The administration has tools and leverage; the obstacles are substantial but not insurmountable. Whether this ends as a serious territorial acquisition or an elaborate negotiating tactic remains genuinely uncertain—which is exactly what the market odds suggest.

---

Analysis informed by aggregated forecaster data from Manifold Markets and Polymarket as of January 20, 2026.